When do you need a lawyer?
Other than those times, when do you actually need an attorney?
Lawyers.com has some guidelines.
Federal rules, the Court said, “do not make such evidence per se admissible or per se inadmissible.” It is up to District Courts, in trying job bias cases (here, an Age Discrimination in Employment Act case), to sort out the fact-intensive nature of such evidence. “Whether evidence of discrimination by other supervisors is relevant in an individual ADEA case is fact based and depends on many factors, including how closely related the evidence is to the plaintiff’s cirfcumstances and theory of the case,” the opinion said.
Labels: employment lawyers
Labels: landlord law, tenant law
As many of you know, the United States Supreme Court in Michigan v. Sitz found that although sobriety checkpoints were apparent violations of the Fourth Amendment, they were only ”minor” violations. Permitting police to stop citizens without reason to believe they had done anything wrong, Chief Justice Rehnquist said, was permissible in view of the government’s ongoing “War on Drunk Driving”.
Gov. Christine Gregoire suffered her first major defeat of the 2008 Legislature on Thursday when her push for drunken-driving checkpoints died without enough support from lawmakers
Labels: DWI/DUI, roadblocks, washington DUI
Labels: DWI/DUI, nevada dwi
Labels: employment lawyers
A breath test case with a good video is a battle worth fighting. There the State's evidence is internally inconsistent with itself.
have one of the highest per capita DUI arrests in the country.
The idea is to make someone who has had more than one drink think twice or three times before getting behind the wheel of a car.
Police and Mothers Against Drunk Drivers support the law as a needed deterrent to one of the more dangerous criminal misdemeanors out there.
Labels: arizona dui, madd
Labels: DWI/DUI, san diego dwi
Labels: arizona dui
Labels: arizona dui
Labels: arizona dui